Quantitative Experimental Analysis of Controlling Factors on Waterflood Efficiency in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

Authors

  • Shijie Zhu Chongqing University of Science and Technology, College of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2193-2646
  • Zhonghua Liu Chongqing University of Science and Technology, College of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3849-6019
  • Yuedi Wang Chongqing University of Science and Technology, College of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China
  • Yiqiang Pan Chongqing University of Science and Technology, College of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3922-5541
  • Heng Zhang CNOOC Energy Development Co., Ltd. Engineering Technology Zhanjiang Branch, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524000, China
  • Xiaoqing Wang Sichuan Nengtou Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd, Sichuan, Chengdu 610000, China
  • Xijin Wang Sichuan Nengtou Tianfu Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd, Sichuan, Chengdu 610000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-787X.2026.13.2

Keywords:

Enhanced oil recovery, Reservoir heterogeneity, Waterflooding efficiency, Threshold pressure gradient, Low-permeability reservoirs.

Abstract

Revealing dominant controls on waterflood efficiency in low-permeability reservoirs is critical for optimizing development strategies and enhancing recovery. This study investigates a low-permeability reservoir through core analysis and displacement experiments, examining threshold pressure gradients and the impacts of permeability variation, pressure differential, and displacing velocity on flood performance. Key findings indicate: 1) A power-law correlation between threshold pressure gradient (G) and permeability (K) in reservoir cores: G = 1.7707 × K⁻⁰·³³⁹ (R² = 0.9246), demonstrating significant crude oil mobilization resistance. 2) At permeability gradients ≥4, low-permeability zones exhibit negligible crude oil displacement. Water injection preferentially channels through high-permeability regions, severely reducing sweep efficiency. 3) Displacement efficiency responds non-monotonically to increasing pressure differential and displacing velocity, showing initial enhancement followed by reduction. Optimal parameters are: A. Pressure differential: 0.5-0.8 MPa; B. Displacing velocity: 0.3 mL/min. 4) Dominant controls on flood efficiency follow the hierarchy: Pressure differential > Displacing velocity > Permeability gradient. Development parameter optimization emerges as an effective strategy for enhancing waterflood performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zeng J, Huang H, Yuan S, Wu C. Low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs characterization using low-frequency seismic attribute. Acta Geophys. 2020; 68(5): 1345-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00474-5

[2] Ji B, Fang J. An overview of efficient development practices at low permeability sandstone reservoirs in China. Energy Geosci. 2023; 4: 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100179

[3] Wang C, Sun Z, Sun Q, Zhang L, Zhang X. Comprehensive evaluation of waterflooding front in low‐permeability reservoir. Energy Sci Eng. 2021; 9(9): 1394-1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.948

[4] Hassani K, Rostami B, Fathollahi A, Saeibehrouzi A. Soaking time effect on low salinity water injection in sandstone reservoirs: wettability, SEM, relative permeability, and waterflooding studies. Egypt J Pet. 2022; 31(2): 23-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2022.04.003

[5] Zhong X, Zhu Y, Jiao T, Qi Z, Luo J, Xie Y, et al. Microscopic pore throat structures and water flooding in heterogeneous low-permeability sandstone reservoirs: a case study of the Jurassic Yan'an Formation in the Huanjiang Area, Ordos Basin, Northern China. J Asian Earth Sci. 2021; 219: 104903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104903

[6] Wang X, Mao L, Kong X. Microscopic effects of long-term water injection on reservoir pore structure. Geoenergy Sci Eng. 2025; 253: 213952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213952

[7] Zhang S. Research on the mechanism of decompression and augmented injection during waterflooding development in low permeability reservoirs. Open Pet Eng J. 2012; 5(1): 53-7. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834101205010053

[8] Cui L. Research and application of potential tapping and efficiency enhancement technology in low permeability oilfield. 2021.

[9] Guo J, Wang H, Wang H. Investigating dynamic evolution of pore structures during long term water flooding via in-situ CT scanning: a case study of the Beibu-Gulf Basin in the South China Sea. Measurement. 2025; 118556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118556

[10] Shi X, Wei J, Huang B, Zheng Q, Yi F, Yin Y, et al. A novel model for oil recovery estimate in heterogeneous low-permeability and tight reservoirs with pseudo threshold pressure gradient. Energy Rep. 2021; 7: 1416-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.017

[11] Lei Q, Xiong W, Yuan J, Gao S, Wu YS. Behavior of flow through low-permeability reservoirs. In: SPE Europe/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition; 2008 Jun 9-12; Rome, Italy https://doi.org/10.2118/113144-MS

[12] Zeng B, Cheng L, Hao F. Experiment and mechanism analysis on threshold pressure gradient with different fluids. In: 34th Annual SPE International Conference and Exhibition; 2010 Jul 31-Aug 7; Tinaga - Calabar, Nigeria

[13] Zha W, Li D, Zeng Y, Lu D. Pressure transient behaviours of vertical wells in low permeability reservoirs with threshold pressure gradient. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol. 2018; 18(3-4): 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2018.093131

[14] Jia J, Yu G, Li S, Peng R, Tang Y. Analysis of key controlling factors for water injection deficiency in low-permeability oil reservoirs: a case study of Chang-8 reservoir in Ordos Basin. Pet Reservoir Eval Dev. 2024; 14(6): 892-98.

[15] Dou H, Ma S, Zou C, Yao S. Threshold pressure gradient of fluid flow through multi-porous media in low and extra-low permeability reservoirs. Sci China Earth Sci. 2014; 57(11): 2808-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4933-1

[16] Li M, Qu Z, Wang M, Wang R. The influence of micro-heterogeneity on water injection development in low-permeability sandstone oil reservoirs. Minerals. 2023; 13(12): 1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121533

[17] Zhou Y, Fang Y, Wang X. A new method for calculating non-piston displacement efficiency in multilayered reservoir with waterflooding. Pet Geol Recovery Effic. 2009; 16(1): 86-89.

[18] Zhu W, Cao Z. Geological characteristics and waterflooding strategy for Yuanshi low permeability sandstone reservoir. Adv Mater Res. 2012; 594-597: 134-39. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.594-597.134

[19] Ma X, Bi Y, Jiang M, Li D, Gu X. Characteristics of water phase permeability variation in medium-low permeability oil reservoirs during high multiple waterflooding. Pet Reservoir Eval Dev. 2025; 15(1): 103-09.

[20] Zhao Y, Chen Z, Yang Y. Research progress on the law of waterflooding front migration in low-permeability tight reservoirs. Petrochem Ind Appl. 2024; 43(5): 1-8.

[21] Yan WH, Wang LM, Wang DZ, Shi XB. Optimization research on cyclic waterflooding in low permeability fractured reservoir. Adv Mater Res. 2012; 424-425: 220-22. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.424-425.220

[22] Wang D, Niu D, Li HA. Predicting waterflooding performance in low-permeability reservoirs with linear dynamical systems. SPE J. 2017; 22(5): 1596-1608. https://doi.org/10.2118/185960-PA

[23] Wang Z, Liu K, Zhang C, Yan H, Yu J, Yu B, et al. Integral effects of porosity, permeability, and wettability on oil-water displacement in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs—insights from X-ray CT-monitored core flooding experiments. Processes. 2023; 11(9): 2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11092786

[24] Wang Z, Cao G, Bai Y. Development status and prospect of EOR technology in low-permeability reservoirs. Spec Oil Gas Reservoirs. 2023; 30(01): 1-13.

[25] Xu J, Jiang R. Non-Darcy flow numerical simulation for low-permeability reservoirs. In: 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating EUROPEC 2012; 2012 Jun 4-7; Copenhagen, Denmark. SPE 154890. https://doi.org/10.2118/154890-MS

[26] Luo L, Cheng S. In-situ characterization of nonlinear flow behavior of fluid in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng. 2021; 203: 108573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108573

[27] Civan F. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transp Porous Media. 2010; 82(2): 375-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z

[28] Deng J, Zhang R, Zhao X, Xu H, Ji P, Zhang Z, et al. Impact of permeability heterogeneity on methane hydrate production behavior during depressurization with controlled sand production. Energy Eng. 2025; 122(10): 4153-68. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.065906

[29] Zhang M, Li B, Zheng L, Xin Y, Xing W, Li Z. Experimental study on CO₂ flooding within a fractured low-permeability reservoir: impact of high injection rate. Fuel. 2025; 384: 134002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.134002

[30] Jia R. Experimental study on start-up pressure gradient of low permeability reservoirs in Fushan sag. Mud Logging Eng. 2018; 29(04): 20-23.

[31] Song L. Experimental study on water flooding in low-permeability reservoirs in XL block. Master's thesis. Heilongjiang: Northeast Petroleum University; 2021.

[32] Hu G, Hu S, Li Y, Liu Z. Effective displacement pressure of five-spot pattern by waterflood development in low permeability reservoir. Pet Reservoir Eval Dev. 2017; 7(03): 20-22.

[33] Al-Ibadi H, Stephen KD, Mackay EJ. Extended fractional-flow model of low-salinity waterflooding accounting for dispersion and effective salinity range. SPE J. 2019; 24(6): 874-888. https://doi.org/10.2118/191222-PA

[34] Zhao H, Xu L, Guo Z, Zhang Q, Liu W, Kang X. Flow-path tracking strategy in a data-driven interwell numerical simulation model for waterflooding history matching and performance prediction with infill wells. SPE J. 2020; 25(2): 1007-25. https://doi.org/10.2118/199361-PA

[35] Zha W, Li D, Zeng Y, Lu D. Pressure transient behaviours of vertical wells in low permeability reservoirs with threshold pressure gradient. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol. 2018; 18: 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2018.093131

[36] Shi X, Wei J, Huang B, Zheng Q, Yi F, Yin Y, et al. A novel model for oil recovery estimate in heterogeneous low-permeability and tight reservoirs with pseudo threshold pressure gradient. Energy Rep. 2021; 7: 1416-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.017

[37] Jiang Z, Ren H, Maimaitiming D, Wang Z, Dong H. Effects of water flooding speed on oil recovery efficiency and residual oil distribution in heterogeneous reservoirs. Pet Sci Technol. 2023; 41: 2362-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2022.2108837

[38] Arab D, Kantzas A, Bryant SL. Water flooding of oil reservoirs: effect of oil viscosity and injection velocity on the interplay between capillary and viscous forces. J Pet Sci Eng. 2019; 182: 106691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106691

[39] Zhu S, Shi L, Wang X, Liu C, Xue X, Ye Z. Investigation into mobility control mechanisms by polymer flooding in offshore high-permeable heavy oil reservoir. Energy Sources Part A. 2020; 46(1): 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1797941

[40] Sun J, Liu D, Zhang L. Grey correlation analysis of the influencing factors on production decline in low permeability reservoirs. Spec Oil Gas Reservoirs. 2012; 19(02): 90-93.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Quantitative Experimental Analysis of Controlling Factors on Waterflood Efficiency in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. Int. J. Pet. Technol. [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 25 [cited 2026 May 4];13(1):17-28. Available from: https://www.avanti-journals.com/index.php/ijpt/article/view/1805

Similar Articles

71-74 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.